Icons

Material Symbols vs Solar

Material Symbols and Solar Icons are two of the most widely used open-source icon sets. Both are free, both ship framework packages, and both will look perfectly reasonable in a product UI — which is exactly why the choice is annoying. This page puts the two side by side using the actual artwork and the real numbers.

The short answer

  • Material Symbols is the broader set: 18,547 icons against 7,410 in Solar Icons — roughly 150% more coverage, which matters most if you build interfaces that need unusual glyphs.
  • Solar Icons gives you more visual range: 6 variants per concept (six coordinated styles), where Material Symbols ships 4.
  • On licensing, Material Symbols is the safer default (Apache 2.0 versus CC BY 4.0).

Specifications compared

Specification comparison
 Material SymbolsSolar Icons
Icons18,5477,410
Visual variants per concept4 — variable weight, fill, grade and optical size axes6 — six coordinated styles
Design grid24×2424×24
LicenseApache 2.0CC BY 4.0
Attribution requiredNoYes
Official React package@material-symbols/svg-400solar-icon-set

Same icons, both libraries

Every pair below is the same concept rendered from each library's own source files. This is the part you cannot get from a written review — the difference in stroke weight, corner rounding and optical size is the thing you will actually notice in your interface.

Material SymbolsSolar Icons 
home
search
settings
user
heart
star
cart
bell
mail
calendar

Which one should you choose?

Pick Material Symbols when

Products that want continuous control over icon weight and fill state, and teams that would rather ship one font file than manage five icon sets.

Consider otherwise if: If you need individually imported SVG components with tree-shaking, the older Material Icons set or Lucide is a better fit — a variable font loads all 18,547 glyphs even if you use thirty of them.

Pick Solar Icons when

SaaS dashboards, admin templates, and marketing sites that want a premium, contemporary look rather than a neutral system feel. Duotone styles work especially well in empty states and feature cards.

Consider otherwise if: Solar is CC BY 4.0, so it requires attribution — if that is a problem, Phosphor (MIT) offers a comparable six-weight range and Huge Icons (MIT) offers six styles of its own.

Coverage

Material Symbols contains 18,547 icons and Solar Icons contains 7,410. Material Symbols is Google's current icon format and the successor to Material Icons. It is built on variable font technology: all 18,547 icons live in a single font file, and four axes — Weight, Fill, Grade, and Optical Size — can be adjusted continuously rather than by swapping between five static themes.

Solar is a premium-feeling icon pack of 7,410 icons from 480 Design, and it is one of the most widely used sets in SaaS and mobile product design. Every icon comes in six styles: Linear, Outline, Bold, Duotone, Broken, and Bold Duotone.

Licensing

Material Symbols is released under Apache 2.0. No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files.

Solar Icons is released under CC BY 4.0. Requires visible attribution wherever the icons appear.

One of these two requires attribution. If the icons will appear somewhere a credit line is impractical — an app icon, a hardware label, a slide deck template — that alone may settle the decision.

Using them from IconStash

You do not have to commit to one. IconStash indexes both libraries, so you can search a concept once and see how each set drew it, then export SVG or PNG at any size and colour. Start with Material Symbols or Solar Icons, or browse every library comparison.

Frequently asked questions

Is Material Symbols or Solar better for React projects?

Both have first-party React packages: @material-symbols/svg-400 and solar-icon-set. Material Symbols has the larger catalogue, so for a React app the practical difference is coverage and visual style rather than integration effort. Both tree-shake, so bundle size tracks the number of icons you import, not the size of the library.

Which has more icons, Material Symbols or Solar?

Material Symbols has 18,547 icons and Solar Icons has 7,410. Material Symbols is larger by about 150%. Raw count is not the whole story though — a 20,000-icon set with many near-duplicate variants can be slower to search than a tightly edited 2,000-icon set.

Can I mix Material Symbols and Solar in one interface?

You can, but it usually looks wrong. Each library draws to its own grid and stroke weight — Material Symbols uses 24×24 and Solar uses 24×24 — so icons from both sit slightly differently next to each other. If you must mix them, keep each library to a distinct area of the interface rather than interleaving them in the same toolbar.

What licenses do Material Symbols and Solar use?

Material Symbols is Apache 2.0: No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files. Solar Icons is CC BY 4.0: Requires visible attribution wherever the icons appear. Neither requires payment, but attribution rules differ, so check before shipping in a product where credit is inconvenient.

Do Material Symbols and Solar include filled and outline versions?

Material Symbols offers variable weight, fill, grade and optical size axes; Solar Icons offers six coordinated styles. If you need to express selected and unselected states with the same glyph, the library with more variants saves you from importing a second set.

Which is better for small sizes like 16px?

At 16px, stroke weight and counter size matter more than coverage. Material Symbols draws on a 24×24 grid and Solar on 24×24. Libraries that redraw per size rather than scaling — such as Fluent UI — generally hold up best. The reliable test is to preview both at your actual render size, which you can do on any icon page on IconStash.