Material Symbols and Fluent UI Icons are two of the most widely used
open-source icon sets. Both are free, both ship framework packages, and both will look perfectly
reasonable in a product UI — which is exactly why the choice is annoying. This page puts the two
side by side using the actual artwork and the real numbers.
The short answer
Coverage is close: 18,547 icons in Material Symbols versus 20,170 in Fluent UI Icons. Neither will leave you hunting for a second library on breadth alone.
Material Symbols gives you more visual range: 4 variants per concept (variable weight, fill, grade and optical size axes), where Fluent UI Icons ships 2.
Both are Apache 2.0, so licensing is not a deciding factor here.
Specifications compared
Specification comparison
Material Symbols
Fluent UI Icons
Icons
18,547
20,170
Visual variants per concept
4 — variable weight, fill, grade and optical size axes
2 — regular and filled
Design grid
24×24
12–48
License
Apache 2.0
MIT
Attribution required
No
No
Official React package
@material-symbols/svg-400
@fluentui/react-icons
Same icons, both libraries
Every pair below is the same concept rendered from each library's own source files. This is the
part you cannot get from a written review — the difference in stroke weight, corner rounding and
optical size is the thing you will actually notice in your interface.
Material SymbolsFluent UI Icons
home
search
settings
—
user
heart
star
cart
mail
calendar
—
download
Which one should you choose?
Pick Material Symbols when
Products that want continuous control over icon weight and fill state, and teams that would rather ship one font file than manage five icon sets.
Consider otherwise if: If you need individually imported SVG components with tree-shaking, the older Material Icons set or Lucide is a better fit — a variable font loads all 18,547 glyphs even if you use thirty of them.
Pick Fluent UI Icons when
Enterprise applications, Microsoft 365 integrations, and products that already follow Fluent or need extremely broad coverage. The count alone means you will rarely need to look elsewhere.
Consider otherwise if: The size is also a drawback — with 20,170 icons, maintaining visual consistency across a product takes more discipline. Lucide and Heroicons are far easier to keep coherent.
Coverage
Material Symbols contains 18,547 icons and Fluent UI Icons contains 20,170.
Material Symbols is Google's current icon format and the successor to Material Icons. It is built on variable font technology: all 18,547 icons live in a single font file, and four axes — Weight, Fill, Grade, and Optical Size — can be adjusted continuously rather than by swapping between five static themes.
Fluent UI Icons is Microsoft's icon library for the Fluent Design System, and at 20,170 icons it is the largest set indexed on IconStash. The icons are drawn across multiple sizes from 12px to 48px and in Regular and Filled styles.
Licensing
Material Symbols is released under Apache 2.0.
No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files.
Fluent UI Icons is released under MIT.
Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required.
Using them from IconStash
You do not have to commit to one. IconStash indexes both libraries, so you can search a concept
once and see how each set drew it, then export SVG or PNG at any size and colour. Start with
Material Symbols or
Fluent UI Icons, or browse
every library comparison.
Frequently asked questions
Is Material Symbols or Fluent UI better for React projects?
Both have first-party React packages: @material-symbols/svg-400 and @fluentui/react-icons. Material Symbols has the smaller catalogue, so for a React app the practical difference is coverage and visual style rather than integration effort. Both tree-shake, so bundle size tracks the number of icons you import, not the size of the library.
Which has more icons, Material Symbols or Fluent UI?
Material Symbols has 18,547 icons and Fluent UI Icons has 20,170. Fluent UI Icons is larger by about 9%. Raw count is not the whole story though — a 20,000-icon set with many near-duplicate variants can be slower to search than a tightly edited 2,000-icon set.
Can I mix Material Symbols and Fluent UI in one interface?
You can, but it usually looks wrong. Each library draws to its own grid and stroke weight — Material Symbols uses 24×24 and Fluent UI uses 12–48 — so icons from both sit slightly differently next to each other. If you must mix them, keep each library to a distinct area of the interface rather than interleaving them in the same toolbar.
What licenses do Material Symbols and Fluent UI use?
Material Symbols is Apache 2.0: No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files. Fluent UI Icons is MIT: Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required. Neither requires payment, but attribution rules differ, so check before shipping in a product where credit is inconvenient.
Do Material Symbols and Fluent UI include filled and outline versions?
Material Symbols offers variable weight, fill, grade and optical size axes; Fluent UI Icons offers regular and filled. If you need to express selected and unselected states with the same glyph, the library with more variants saves you from importing a second set.
Which is better for small sizes like 16px?
At 16px, stroke weight and counter size matter more than coverage. Material Symbols draws on a 24×24 grid and Fluent UI on 12–48. Libraries that redraw per size rather than scaling — such as Fluent UI — generally hold up best. The reliable test is to preview both at your actual render size, which you can do on any icon page on IconStash.