Icons

Feather vs Material Symbols

Feather Icons and Material Symbols are two of the most widely used open-source icon sets. Both are free, both ship framework packages, and both will look perfectly reasonable in a product UI — which is exactly why the choice is annoying. This page puts the two side by side using the actual artwork and the real numbers.

The short answer

  • Material Symbols is the broader set: 18,547 icons against 286 in Feather Icons — roughly 6385% more coverage, which matters most if you build interfaces that need unusual glyphs.
  • Material Symbols gives you more visual range: 4 variants per concept (variable weight, fill, grade and optical size axes), where Feather Icons ships 1.
  • Both are MIT, so licensing is not a deciding factor here.

Specifications compared

Specification comparison
 Feather IconsMaterial Symbols
Icons28618,547
Visual variants per concept1 — outline only4 — variable weight, fill, grade and optical size axes
Design grid24×2424×24
LicenseMITApache 2.0
Attribution requiredNoNo
Official React packagereact-feather@material-symbols/svg-400

Same icons, both libraries

Every pair below is the same concept rendered from each library's own source files. This is the part you cannot get from a written review — the difference in stroke weight, corner rounding and optical size is the thing you will actually notice in your interface.

Feather IconsMaterial Symbols 
home
search
settings
user
heart
star
cart
bell
mail
calendar

Which one should you choose?

Pick Feather Icons when

Landing pages, portfolios, marketing sites, and small apps where you need perhaps thirty icons and want them to look calm and deliberate. Feather is also a good teaching reference for icon grid discipline.

Consider otherwise if: For an actively maintained superset with the same aesthetic, use Lucide — it began as a Feather fork and now has 1,979 icons. Iconoir is another minimalist option with far more coverage.

Pick Material Symbols when

Products that want continuous control over icon weight and fill state, and teams that would rather ship one font file than manage five icon sets.

Consider otherwise if: If you need individually imported SVG components with tree-shaking, the older Material Icons set or Lucide is a better fit — a variable font loads all 18,547 glyphs even if you use thirty of them.

Coverage

Feather Icons contains 286 icons and Material Symbols contains 18,547. Feather Icons is the library that defined the modern minimal outline icon. Created by Cole Bemis in 2017, its 286 icons are drawn on a 24×24 grid with a 2px stroke, rounded joins, and no fill — a formula that an entire generation of icon libraries has since copied.

Material Symbols is Google's current icon format and the successor to Material Icons. It is built on variable font technology: all 18,547 icons live in a single font file, and four axes — Weight, Fill, Grade, and Optical Size — can be adjusted continuously rather than by swapping between five static themes.

Licensing

Feather Icons is released under MIT. Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required.

Material Symbols is released under Apache 2.0. No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files.

Using them from IconStash

You do not have to commit to one. IconStash indexes both libraries, so you can search a concept once and see how each set drew it, then export SVG or PNG at any size and colour. Start with Feather Icons or Material Symbols, or browse every library comparison.

Frequently asked questions

Is Feather or Material Symbols better for React projects?

Both have first-party React packages: react-feather and @material-symbols/svg-400. Feather has the smaller catalogue, so for a React app the practical difference is coverage and visual style rather than integration effort. Both tree-shake, so bundle size tracks the number of icons you import, not the size of the library.

Which has more icons, Feather or Material Symbols?

Feather Icons has 286 icons and Material Symbols has 18,547. Material Symbols is larger by about 6385%. Raw count is not the whole story though — a 20,000-icon set with many near-duplicate variants can be slower to search than a tightly edited 2,000-icon set.

Can I mix Feather and Material Symbols in one interface?

You can, but it usually looks wrong. Each library draws to its own grid and stroke weight — Feather uses 24×24 and Material Symbols uses 24×24 — so icons from both sit slightly differently next to each other. If you must mix them, keep each library to a distinct area of the interface rather than interleaving them in the same toolbar.

What licenses do Feather and Material Symbols use?

Feather Icons is MIT: Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required. Material Symbols is Apache 2.0: No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files. Neither requires payment, but attribution rules differ, so check before shipping in a product where credit is inconvenient.

Do Feather and Material Symbols include filled and outline versions?

Feather Icons offers outline only; Material Symbols offers variable weight, fill, grade and optical size axes. If you need to express selected and unselected states with the same glyph, the library with more variants saves you from importing a second set.

Which is better for small sizes like 16px?

At 16px, stroke weight and counter size matter more than coverage. Feather draws on a 24×24 grid and Material Symbols on 24×24. Libraries that redraw per size rather than scaling — such as Fluent UI — generally hold up best. The reliable test is to preview both at your actual render size, which you can do on any icon page on IconStash.