Feather Icons and Carbon Icons are two of the most widely used
open-source icon sets. Both are free, both ship framework packages, and both will look perfectly
reasonable in a product UI — which is exactly why the choice is annoying. This page puts the two
side by side using the actual artwork and the real numbers.
The short answer
Carbon Icons is the broader set: 2,644 icons against 286 in Feather Icons — roughly 824% more coverage, which matters most if you build interfaces that need unusual glyphs.
Feather Icons gives you more visual range: 1 variant per concept (outline only), where Carbon Icons ships 1.
Both are MIT, so licensing is not a deciding factor here.
Specifications compared
Specification comparison
Feather Icons
Carbon Icons
Icons
286
2,644
Visual variants per concept
1 — outline only
1 — outline only
Design grid
24×24
32×32
License
MIT
Apache 2.0
Attribution required
No
No
Official React package
react-feather
@carbon/icons-react
Same icons, both libraries
Every pair below is the same concept rendered from each library's own source files. This is the
part you cannot get from a written review — the difference in stroke weight, corner rounding and
optical size is the thing you will actually notice in your interface.
Feather IconsCarbon Icons
home
search
settings
user
heart
star
cart
—
bell
mail
calendar
Which one should you choose?
Pick Feather Icons when
Landing pages, portfolios, marketing sites, and small apps where you need perhaps thirty icons and want them to look calm and deliberate. Feather is also a good teaching reference for icon grid discipline.
Consider otherwise if: For an actively maintained superset with the same aesthetic, use Lucide — it began as a Feather fork and now has 1,979 icons. Iconoir is another minimalist option with far more coverage.
Pick Carbon Icons when
Enterprise software, data and analytics platforms, and products that need to satisfy accessibility review and ship in multiple locales.
Consider otherwise if: For a lighter, more contemporary feel, Lucide and Tabler are easier to work with. Fluent UI is the other major enterprise set, with far more icons.
Coverage
Feather Icons contains 286 icons and Carbon Icons contains 2,644.
Feather Icons is the library that defined the modern minimal outline icon. Created by Cole Bemis in 2017, its 286 icons are drawn on a 24×24 grid with a 2px stroke, rounded joins, and no fill — a formula that an entire generation of icon libraries has since copied.
Carbon Icons is IBM's open-source icon library, built as part of the Carbon Design System. The 2,644 icons are drawn on a 32×32 grid — significantly larger than the 24×24 most libraries use — which gives the set a slightly more generous, open feel and room for finer internal detail.
Licensing
Feather Icons is released under MIT.
Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required.
Carbon Icons is released under Apache 2.0.
No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files.
Using them from IconStash
You do not have to commit to one. IconStash indexes both libraries, so you can search a concept
once and see how each set drew it, then export SVG or PNG at any size and colour. Start with
Feather Icons or
Carbon Icons, or browse
every library comparison.
Frequently asked questions
Is Feather or Carbon better for React projects?
Both have first-party React packages: react-feather and @carbon/icons-react. Feather has the smaller catalogue, so for a React app the practical difference is coverage and visual style rather than integration effort. Both tree-shake, so bundle size tracks the number of icons you import, not the size of the library.
Which has more icons, Feather or Carbon?
Feather Icons has 286 icons and Carbon Icons has 2,644. Carbon Icons is larger by about 824%. Raw count is not the whole story though — a 20,000-icon set with many near-duplicate variants can be slower to search than a tightly edited 2,000-icon set.
Can I mix Feather and Carbon in one interface?
You can, but it usually looks wrong. Each library draws to its own grid and stroke weight — Feather uses 24×24 and Carbon uses 32×32 — so icons from both sit slightly differently next to each other. If you must mix them, keep each library to a distinct area of the interface rather than interleaving them in the same toolbar.
What licenses do Feather and Carbon use?
Feather Icons is MIT: Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required. Carbon Icons is Apache 2.0: No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files. Neither requires payment, but attribution rules differ, so check before shipping in a product where credit is inconvenient.
Do Feather and Carbon include filled and outline versions?
Feather Icons offers outline only; Carbon Icons offers outline only. If you need to express selected and unselected states with the same glyph, the library with more variants saves you from importing a second set.
Which is better for small sizes like 16px?
At 16px, stroke weight and counter size matter more than coverage. Feather draws on a 24×24 grid and Carbon on 32×32. Libraries that redraw per size rather than scaling — such as Fluent UI — generally hold up best. The reliable test is to preview both at your actual render size, which you can do on any icon page on IconStash.