Carbon Icons and Fluent UI Icons are two of the most widely used
open-source icon sets. Both are free, both ship framework packages, and both will look perfectly
reasonable in a product UI — which is exactly why the choice is annoying. This page puts the two
side by side using the actual artwork and the real numbers.
The short answer
Fluent UI Icons is the broader set: 20,170 icons against 2,644 in Carbon Icons — roughly 663% more coverage, which matters most if you build interfaces that need unusual glyphs.
Fluent UI Icons gives you more visual range: 2 variants per concept (regular and filled), where Carbon Icons ships 1.
Both are Apache 2.0, so licensing is not a deciding factor here.
Specifications compared
Specification comparison
Carbon Icons
Fluent UI Icons
Icons
2,644
20,170
Visual variants per concept
1 — outline only
2 — regular and filled
Design grid
32×32
12–48
License
Apache 2.0
MIT
Attribution required
No
No
Official React package
@carbon/icons-react
@fluentui/react-icons
Same icons, both libraries
Every pair below is the same concept rendered from each library's own source files. This is the
part you cannot get from a written review — the difference in stroke weight, corner rounding and
optical size is the thing you will actually notice in your interface.
Carbon IconsFluent UI Icons
home
search
settings
—
user
heart
star
cart
mail
calendar
—
download
Which one should you choose?
Pick Carbon Icons when
Enterprise software, data and analytics platforms, and products that need to satisfy accessibility review and ship in multiple locales.
Consider otherwise if: For a lighter, more contemporary feel, Lucide and Tabler are easier to work with. Fluent UI is the other major enterprise set, with far more icons.
Pick Fluent UI Icons when
Enterprise applications, Microsoft 365 integrations, and products that already follow Fluent or need extremely broad coverage. The count alone means you will rarely need to look elsewhere.
Consider otherwise if: The size is also a drawback — with 20,170 icons, maintaining visual consistency across a product takes more discipline. Lucide and Heroicons are far easier to keep coherent.
Coverage
Carbon Icons contains 2,644 icons and Fluent UI Icons contains 20,170.
Carbon Icons is IBM's open-source icon library, built as part of the Carbon Design System. The 2,644 icons are drawn on a 32×32 grid — significantly larger than the 24×24 most libraries use — which gives the set a slightly more generous, open feel and room for finer internal detail.
Fluent UI Icons is Microsoft's icon library for the Fluent Design System, and at 20,170 icons it is the largest set indexed on IconStash. The icons are drawn across multiple sizes from 12px to 48px and in Regular and Filled styles.
Licensing
Carbon Icons is released under Apache 2.0.
No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files.
Fluent UI Icons is released under MIT.
Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required.
Using them from IconStash
You do not have to commit to one. IconStash indexes both libraries, so you can search a concept
once and see how each set drew it, then export SVG or PNG at any size and colour. Start with
Carbon Icons or
Fluent UI Icons, or browse
every library comparison.
Frequently asked questions
Is Carbon or Fluent UI better for React projects?
Both have first-party React packages: @carbon/icons-react and @fluentui/react-icons. Carbon has the smaller catalogue, so for a React app the practical difference is coverage and visual style rather than integration effort. Both tree-shake, so bundle size tracks the number of icons you import, not the size of the library.
Which has more icons, Carbon or Fluent UI?
Carbon Icons has 2,644 icons and Fluent UI Icons has 20,170. Fluent UI Icons is larger by about 663%. Raw count is not the whole story though — a 20,000-icon set with many near-duplicate variants can be slower to search than a tightly edited 2,000-icon set.
Can I mix Carbon and Fluent UI in one interface?
You can, but it usually looks wrong. Each library draws to its own grid and stroke weight — Carbon uses 32×32 and Fluent UI uses 12–48 — so icons from both sit slightly differently next to each other. If you must mix them, keep each library to a distinct area of the interface rather than interleaving them in the same toolbar.
What licenses do Carbon and Fluent UI use?
Carbon Icons is Apache 2.0: No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files. Fluent UI Icons is MIT: Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required. Neither requires payment, but attribution rules differ, so check before shipping in a product where credit is inconvenient.
Do Carbon and Fluent UI include filled and outline versions?
Carbon Icons offers outline only; Fluent UI Icons offers regular and filled. If you need to express selected and unselected states with the same glyph, the library with more variants saves you from importing a second set.
Which is better for small sizes like 16px?
At 16px, stroke weight and counter size matter more than coverage. Carbon draws on a 32×32 grid and Fluent UI on 12–48. Libraries that redraw per size rather than scaling — such as Fluent UI — generally hold up best. The reliable test is to preview both at your actual render size, which you can do on any icon page on IconStash.