Icons

Carbon vs Radix

Carbon Icons and Radix Icons are two of the most widely used open-source icon sets. Both are free, both ship framework packages, and both will look perfectly reasonable in a product UI — which is exactly why the choice is annoying. This page puts the two side by side using the actual artwork and the real numbers.

The short answer

  • Carbon Icons is the broader set: 2,644 icons against 345 in Radix Icons — roughly 666% more coverage, which matters most if you build interfaces that need unusual glyphs.
  • Carbon Icons gives you more visual range: 1 variant per concept (outline only), where Radix Icons ships 1.
  • Both are Apache 2.0, so licensing is not a deciding factor here.

Specifications compared

Specification comparison
 Carbon IconsRadix Icons
Icons2,644345
Visual variants per concept1 — outline only1 — outline only
Design grid32×3215×15
LicenseApache 2.0MIT
Attribution requiredNoNo
Official React package@carbon/icons-react@radix-ui/react-icons

Same icons, both libraries

Every pair below is the same concept rendered from each library's own source files. This is the part you cannot get from a written review — the difference in stroke weight, corner rounding and optical size is the thing you will actually notice in your interface.

Carbon IconsRadix Icons 
home
search
settings
user
heart
star
cart
bell
mail
calendar

Which one should you choose?

Pick Carbon Icons when

Enterprise software, data and analytics platforms, and products that need to satisfy accessibility review and ship in multiple locales.

Consider otherwise if: For a lighter, more contemporary feel, Lucide and Tabler are easier to work with. Fluent UI is the other major enterprise set, with far more icons.

Pick Radix Icons when

Dense product UI: data tables, command palettes, context menus, settings panels, and anywhere you need an icon to occupy as little space as possible while staying legible.

Consider otherwise if: The 345-icon count is small, so you will hit gaps quickly in a large product. Heroicons also ships a drawn 16px size with many more icons; Lucide covers far more concepts at 24×24.

Coverage

Carbon Icons contains 2,644 icons and Radix Icons contains 345. Carbon Icons is IBM's open-source icon library, built as part of the Carbon Design System. The 2,644 icons are drawn on a 32×32 grid — significantly larger than the 24×24 most libraries use — which gives the set a slightly more generous, open feel and room for finer internal detail.

Radix Icons is a deliberately small set of 345 icons from the Radix UI team, drawn on a 15×15 grid. That grid is the whole point: Radix icons are designed to sit inside dense product interfaces — tables, toolbars, context menus, and form controls — where a 24×24 icon would force you to loosen your spacing.

Licensing

Carbon Icons is released under Apache 2.0. No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files.

Radix Icons is released under MIT. Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required.

Using them from IconStash

You do not have to commit to one. IconStash indexes both libraries, so you can search a concept once and see how each set drew it, then export SVG or PNG at any size and colour. Start with Carbon Icons or Radix Icons, or browse every library comparison.

Frequently asked questions

Is Carbon or Radix better for React projects?

Both have first-party React packages: @carbon/icons-react and @radix-ui/react-icons. Carbon has the larger catalogue, so for a React app the practical difference is coverage and visual style rather than integration effort. Both tree-shake, so bundle size tracks the number of icons you import, not the size of the library.

Which has more icons, Carbon or Radix?

Carbon Icons has 2,644 icons and Radix Icons has 345. Carbon Icons is larger by about 666%. Raw count is not the whole story though — a 20,000-icon set with many near-duplicate variants can be slower to search than a tightly edited 2,000-icon set.

Can I mix Carbon and Radix in one interface?

You can, but it usually looks wrong. Each library draws to its own grid and stroke weight — Carbon uses 32×32 and Radix uses 15×15 — so icons from both sit slightly differently next to each other. If you must mix them, keep each library to a distinct area of the interface rather than interleaving them in the same toolbar.

What licenses do Carbon and Radix use?

Carbon Icons is Apache 2.0: No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files. Radix Icons is MIT: Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required. Neither requires payment, but attribution rules differ, so check before shipping in a product where credit is inconvenient.

Do Carbon and Radix include filled and outline versions?

Carbon Icons offers outline only; Radix Icons offers outline only. If you need to express selected and unselected states with the same glyph, the library with more variants saves you from importing a second set.

Which is better for small sizes like 16px?

At 16px, stroke weight and counter size matter more than coverage. Carbon draws on a 32×32 grid and Radix on 15×15. Libraries that redraw per size rather than scaling — such as Fluent UI — generally hold up best. The reliable test is to preview both at your actual render size, which you can do on any icon page on IconStash.