Icons

Carbon vs Ionicons

Carbon Icons and Ionicons are two of the most widely used open-source icon sets. Both are free, both ship framework packages, and both will look perfectly reasonable in a product UI — which is exactly why the choice is annoying. This page puts the two side by side using the actual artwork and the real numbers.

The short answer

  • Coverage is close: 2,644 icons in Carbon Icons versus 2,607 in Ionicons. Neither will leave you hunting for a second library on breadth alone.
  • Ionicons gives you more visual range: 3 variants per concept (outline, filled and sharp), where Carbon Icons ships 1.
  • Both are Apache 2.0, so licensing is not a deciding factor here.

Specifications compared

Specification comparison
 Carbon IconsIonicons
Icons2,6442,607
Visual variants per concept1 — outline only3 — outline, filled and sharp
Design grid32×3224×24
LicenseApache 2.0MIT
Attribution requiredNoNo
Official React package@carbon/icons-reactionicons

Same icons, both libraries

Every pair below is the same concept rendered from each library's own source files. This is the part you cannot get from a written review — the difference in stroke weight, corner rounding and optical size is the thing you will actually notice in your interface.

Carbon IconsIonicons 
home
search
settings
user
heart
star
cart
bell
mail
calendar

Which one should you choose?

Pick Carbon Icons when

Enterprise software, data and analytics platforms, and products that need to satisfy accessibility review and ship in multiple locales.

Consider otherwise if: For a lighter, more contemporary feel, Lucide and Tabler are easier to work with. Fluent UI is the other major enterprise set, with far more icons.

Pick Ionicons when

Mobile and hybrid apps, cross-platform products, and interfaces that want three clear icon variants from one consistent source.

Consider otherwise if: For a more modern, minimal aesthetic, Lucide and Heroicons are the current defaults. Material Design Icons offers five themes if you need more range.

Coverage

Carbon Icons contains 2,644 icons and Ionicons contains 2,607. Carbon Icons is IBM's open-source icon library, built as part of the Carbon Design System. The 2,644 icons are drawn on a 32×32 grid — significantly larger than the 24×24 most libraries use — which gives the set a slightly more generous, open feel and room for finer internal detail.

Ionicons was built for the Ionic Framework and has been refined since 2013, which makes it one of the longest-maintained icon sets here. The 2,607 icons ship in three variants — Outline, Filled, and Sharp — each drawn on a 24×24 grid.

Licensing

Carbon Icons is released under Apache 2.0. No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files.

Ionicons is released under MIT. Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required.

Using them from IconStash

You do not have to commit to one. IconStash indexes both libraries, so you can search a concept once and see how each set drew it, then export SVG or PNG at any size and colour. Start with Carbon Icons or Ionicons, or browse every library comparison.

Frequently asked questions

Is Carbon or Ionicons better for React projects?

Both have first-party React packages: @carbon/icons-react and ionicons. Carbon has the larger catalogue, so for a React app the practical difference is coverage and visual style rather than integration effort. Both tree-shake, so bundle size tracks the number of icons you import, not the size of the library.

Which has more icons, Carbon or Ionicons?

Carbon Icons has 2,644 icons and Ionicons has 2,607. Carbon Icons is larger by about 1%. Raw count is not the whole story though — a 20,000-icon set with many near-duplicate variants can be slower to search than a tightly edited 2,000-icon set.

Can I mix Carbon and Ionicons in one interface?

You can, but it usually looks wrong. Each library draws to its own grid and stroke weight — Carbon uses 32×32 and Ionicons uses 24×24 — so icons from both sit slightly differently next to each other. If you must mix them, keep each library to a distinct area of the interface rather than interleaving them in the same toolbar.

What licenses do Carbon and Ionicons use?

Carbon Icons is Apache 2.0: No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files. Ionicons is MIT: Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required. Neither requires payment, but attribution rules differ, so check before shipping in a product where credit is inconvenient.

Do Carbon and Ionicons include filled and outline versions?

Carbon Icons offers outline only; Ionicons offers outline, filled and sharp. If you need to express selected and unselected states with the same glyph, the library with more variants saves you from importing a second set.

Which is better for small sizes like 16px?

At 16px, stroke weight and counter size matter more than coverage. Carbon draws on a 32×32 grid and Ionicons on 24×24. Libraries that redraw per size rather than scaling — such as Fluent UI — generally hold up best. The reliable test is to preview both at your actual render size, which you can do on any icon page on IconStash.