Icons

Phosphor vs Material

Phosphor Icons and Material Design Icons are two of the most widely used open-source icon sets. Both are free, both ship framework packages, and both will look perfectly reasonable in a product UI — which is exactly why the choice is annoying. This page puts the two side by side using the actual artwork and the real numbers.

The short answer

  • Material Design Icons is the broader set: 14,001 icons against 9,198 in Phosphor Icons — roughly 52% more coverage, which matters most if you build interfaces that need unusual glyphs.
  • Phosphor Icons gives you more visual range: 6 variants per concept (thin, light, regular, bold, fill and duotone), where Material Design Icons ships 5.
  • Both are MIT, so licensing is not a deciding factor here.

Specifications compared

Specification comparison
 Phosphor IconsMaterial Design Icons
Icons9,19814,001
Visual variants per concept6 — thin, light, regular, bold, fill and duotone5 — outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled
Design grid24×2424×24
LicenseMITApache 2.0
Attribution requiredNoNo
Official React packagephosphor-react@mui/icons-material

Same icons, both libraries

Every pair below is the same concept rendered from each library's own source files. This is the part you cannot get from a written review — the difference in stroke weight, corner rounding and optical size is the thing you will actually notice in your interface.

Phosphor IconsMaterial Design Icons 
home
search
settings
user
heart
star
cart
bell
mail
calendar

Which one should you choose?

Pick Phosphor Icons when

Design systems, products with strong visual hierarchy, and teams that want one library to cover every context. The weight range also solves the common problem of outline icons disappearing on coloured or photographic backgrounds.

Consider otherwise if: If you only need one weight, the six-weight structure is overhead you will not use — Lucide or Tabler are simpler. If you want duotone plus a premium aesthetic, compare Solar and Huge Icons.

Pick Material Design Icons when

Products that follow Material Design, Android-adjacent apps, and any interface where recognition matters more than distinctiveness. If your users already use Gmail, Drive, or Android, these icons need no explanation.

Consider otherwise if: Google's newer Material Symbols supersedes this set with variable-font icons in a single file. For a less Google-flavoured look, Fluent UI and Carbon are the enterprise equivalents.

Coverage

Phosphor Icons contains 9,198 icons and Material Design Icons contains 14,001. Phosphor is built around a single idea: one icon family that works at every weight. Each of its 9,198 icons is available in six weights — Thin, Light, Regular, Bold, Fill, and Duotone — so you can express hierarchy, hover state, and emphasis without ever leaving the library.

Material Design Icons is Google's official icon set, and it is the most widely deployed icon vocabulary on the web. The 14,001 icons follow the Material geometry rules — a 24×24 grid with 2px keypoint padding, straight edges softened by corner radii, and a deliberate, slightly geometric construction.

Licensing

Phosphor Icons is released under MIT. Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required.

Material Design Icons is released under Apache 2.0. No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files.

Using them from IconStash

You do not have to commit to one. IconStash indexes both libraries, so you can search a concept once and see how each set drew it, then export SVG or PNG at any size and colour. Start with Phosphor Icons or Material Design Icons, or browse every library comparison.

Frequently asked questions

Is Phosphor or Material better for React projects?

Both have first-party React packages: phosphor-react and @mui/icons-material. Phosphor has the smaller catalogue, so for a React app the practical difference is coverage and visual style rather than integration effort. Both tree-shake, so bundle size tracks the number of icons you import, not the size of the library.

Which has more icons, Phosphor or Material?

Phosphor Icons has 9,198 icons and Material Design Icons has 14,001. Material Design Icons is larger by about 52%. Raw count is not the whole story though — a 20,000-icon set with many near-duplicate variants can be slower to search than a tightly edited 2,000-icon set.

Can I mix Phosphor and Material in one interface?

You can, but it usually looks wrong. Each library draws to its own grid and stroke weight — Phosphor uses 24×24 and Material uses 24×24 — so icons from both sit slightly differently next to each other. If you must mix them, keep each library to a distinct area of the interface rather than interleaving them in the same toolbar.

What licenses do Phosphor and Material use?

Phosphor Icons is MIT: Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required. Material Design Icons is Apache 2.0: No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files. Neither requires payment, but attribution rules differ, so check before shipping in a product where credit is inconvenient.

Do Phosphor and Material include filled and outline versions?

Phosphor Icons offers thin, light, regular, bold, fill and duotone; Material Design Icons offers outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled. If you need to express selected and unselected states with the same glyph, the library with more variants saves you from importing a second set.

Which is better for small sizes like 16px?

At 16px, stroke weight and counter size matter more than coverage. Phosphor draws on a 24×24 grid and Material on 24×24. Libraries that redraw per size rather than scaling — such as Fluent UI — generally hold up best. The reliable test is to preview both at your actual render size, which you can do on any icon page on IconStash.