Icons

Phosphor vs Ionicons

Phosphor Icons and Ionicons are two of the most widely used open-source icon sets. Both are free, both ship framework packages, and both will look perfectly reasonable in a product UI — which is exactly why the choice is annoying. This page puts the two side by side using the actual artwork and the real numbers.

The short answer

  • Phosphor Icons is the broader set: 9,198 icons against 2,607 in Ionicons — roughly 253% more coverage, which matters most if you build interfaces that need unusual glyphs.
  • Phosphor Icons gives you more visual range: 6 variants per concept (thin, light, regular, bold, fill and duotone), where Ionicons ships 3.
  • Both are MIT, so licensing is not a deciding factor here.

Specifications compared

Specification comparison
 Phosphor IconsIonicons
Icons9,1982,607
Visual variants per concept6 — thin, light, regular, bold, fill and duotone3 — outline, filled and sharp
Design grid24×2424×24
LicenseMITMIT
Attribution requiredNoNo
Official React packagephosphor-reactionicons

Same icons, both libraries

Every pair below is the same concept rendered from each library's own source files. This is the part you cannot get from a written review — the difference in stroke weight, corner rounding and optical size is the thing you will actually notice in your interface.

Phosphor IconsIonicons 
home
search
settings
user
heart
star
cart
bell
mail
calendar

Which one should you choose?

Pick Phosphor Icons when

Design systems, products with strong visual hierarchy, and teams that want one library to cover every context. The weight range also solves the common problem of outline icons disappearing on coloured or photographic backgrounds.

Consider otherwise if: If you only need one weight, the six-weight structure is overhead you will not use — Lucide or Tabler are simpler. If you want duotone plus a premium aesthetic, compare Solar and Huge Icons.

Pick Ionicons when

Mobile and hybrid apps, cross-platform products, and interfaces that want three clear icon variants from one consistent source.

Consider otherwise if: For a more modern, minimal aesthetic, Lucide and Heroicons are the current defaults. Material Design Icons offers five themes if you need more range.

Coverage

Phosphor Icons contains 9,198 icons and Ionicons contains 2,607. Phosphor is built around a single idea: one icon family that works at every weight. Each of its 9,198 icons is available in six weights — Thin, Light, Regular, Bold, Fill, and Duotone — so you can express hierarchy, hover state, and emphasis without ever leaving the library.

Ionicons was built for the Ionic Framework and has been refined since 2013, which makes it one of the longest-maintained icon sets here. The 2,607 icons ship in three variants — Outline, Filled, and Sharp — each drawn on a 24×24 grid.

Licensing

Phosphor Icons is released under MIT. Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required.

Ionicons is released under MIT. Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required.

Using them from IconStash

You do not have to commit to one. IconStash indexes both libraries, so you can search a concept once and see how each set drew it, then export SVG or PNG at any size and colour. Start with Phosphor Icons or Ionicons, or browse every library comparison.

Frequently asked questions

Is Phosphor or Ionicons better for React projects?

Both have first-party React packages: phosphor-react and ionicons. Phosphor has the larger catalogue, so for a React app the practical difference is coverage and visual style rather than integration effort. Both tree-shake, so bundle size tracks the number of icons you import, not the size of the library.

Which has more icons, Phosphor or Ionicons?

Phosphor Icons has 9,198 icons and Ionicons has 2,607. Phosphor Icons is larger by about 253%. Raw count is not the whole story though — a 20,000-icon set with many near-duplicate variants can be slower to search than a tightly edited 2,000-icon set.

Can I mix Phosphor and Ionicons in one interface?

You can, but it usually looks wrong. Each library draws to its own grid and stroke weight — Phosphor uses 24×24 and Ionicons uses 24×24 — so icons from both sit slightly differently next to each other. If you must mix them, keep each library to a distinct area of the interface rather than interleaving them in the same toolbar.

What licenses do Phosphor and Ionicons use?

Phosphor Icons is MIT: Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required. Ionicons is MIT: Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required. Neither requires payment, but attribution rules differ, so check before shipping in a product where credit is inconvenient.

Do Phosphor and Ionicons include filled and outline versions?

Phosphor Icons offers thin, light, regular, bold, fill and duotone; Ionicons offers outline, filled and sharp. If you need to express selected and unselected states with the same glyph, the library with more variants saves you from importing a second set.

Which is better for small sizes like 16px?

At 16px, stroke weight and counter size matter more than coverage. Phosphor draws on a 24×24 grid and Ionicons on 24×24. Libraries that redraw per size rather than scaling — such as Fluent UI — generally hold up best. The reliable test is to preview both at your actual render size, which you can do on any icon page on IconStash.