Material Design Icons and Solar Icons are two of the most widely used
open-source icon sets. Both are free, both ship framework packages, and both will look perfectly
reasonable in a product UI — which is exactly why the choice is annoying. This page puts the two
side by side using the actual artwork and the real numbers.
The short answer
Material Design Icons is the broader set: 14,001 icons against 7,410 in Solar Icons — roughly 89% more coverage, which matters most if you build interfaces that need unusual glyphs.
Solar Icons gives you more visual range: 6 variants per concept (six coordinated styles), where Material Design Icons ships 5.
On licensing, Material Design Icons is the safer default (Apache 2.0 versus CC BY 4.0).
Specifications compared
Specification comparison
Material Design Icons
Solar Icons
Icons
14,001
7,410
Visual variants per concept
5 — outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled
6 — six coordinated styles
Design grid
24×24
24×24
License
Apache 2.0
CC BY 4.0
Attribution required
No
Yes
Official React package
@mui/icons-material
solar-icon-set
Same icons, both libraries
Every pair below is the same concept rendered from each library's own source files. This is the
part you cannot get from a written review — the difference in stroke weight, corner rounding and
optical size is the thing you will actually notice in your interface.
Material Design IconsSolar Icons
home
—
search
settings
user
heart
star
cart
bell
—
mail
calendar
Which one should you choose?
Pick Material Design Icons when
Products that follow Material Design, Android-adjacent apps, and any interface where recognition matters more than distinctiveness. If your users already use Gmail, Drive, or Android, these icons need no explanation.
Consider otherwise if: Google's newer Material Symbols supersedes this set with variable-font icons in a single file. For a less Google-flavoured look, Fluent UI and Carbon are the enterprise equivalents.
Pick Solar Icons when
SaaS dashboards, admin templates, and marketing sites that want a premium, contemporary look rather than a neutral system feel. Duotone styles work especially well in empty states and feature cards.
Consider otherwise if: Solar is CC BY 4.0, so it requires attribution — if that is a problem, Phosphor (MIT) offers a comparable six-weight range and Huge Icons (MIT) offers six styles of its own.
Coverage
Material Design Icons contains 14,001 icons and Solar Icons contains 7,410.
Material Design Icons is Google's official icon set, and it is the most widely deployed icon vocabulary on the web. The 14,001 icons follow the Material geometry rules — a 24×24 grid with 2px keypoint padding, straight edges softened by corner radii, and a deliberate, slightly geometric construction.
Solar is a premium-feeling icon pack of 7,410 icons from 480 Design, and it is one of the most widely used sets in SaaS and mobile product design. Every icon comes in six styles: Linear, Outline, Bold, Duotone, Broken, and Bold Duotone.
Licensing
Material Design Icons is released under Apache 2.0.
No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files.
Solar Icons is released under CC BY 4.0.
Requires visible attribution wherever the icons appear.
One of these two requires attribution. If the icons will appear somewhere a
credit line is impractical — an app icon, a hardware label, a slide deck template — that alone may
settle the decision.
Using them from IconStash
You do not have to commit to one. IconStash indexes both libraries, so you can search a concept
once and see how each set drew it, then export SVG or PNG at any size and colour. Start with
Material Design Icons or
Solar Icons, or browse
every library comparison.
Frequently asked questions
Is Material or Solar better for React projects?
Both have first-party React packages: @mui/icons-material and solar-icon-set. Material has the larger catalogue, so for a React app the practical difference is coverage and visual style rather than integration effort. Both tree-shake, so bundle size tracks the number of icons you import, not the size of the library.
Which has more icons, Material or Solar?
Material Design Icons has 14,001 icons and Solar Icons has 7,410. Material Design Icons is larger by about 89%. Raw count is not the whole story though — a 20,000-icon set with many near-duplicate variants can be slower to search than a tightly edited 2,000-icon set.
Can I mix Material and Solar in one interface?
You can, but it usually looks wrong. Each library draws to its own grid and stroke weight — Material uses 24×24 and Solar uses 24×24 — so icons from both sit slightly differently next to each other. If you must mix them, keep each library to a distinct area of the interface rather than interleaving them in the same toolbar.
What licenses do Material and Solar use?
Material Design Icons is Apache 2.0: No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files. Solar Icons is CC BY 4.0: Requires visible attribution wherever the icons appear. Neither requires payment, but attribution rules differ, so check before shipping in a product where credit is inconvenient.
Do Material and Solar include filled and outline versions?
Material Design Icons offers outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled; Solar Icons offers six coordinated styles. If you need to express selected and unselected states with the same glyph, the library with more variants saves you from importing a second set.
Which is better for small sizes like 16px?
At 16px, stroke weight and counter size matter more than coverage. Material draws on a 24×24 grid and Solar on 24×24. Libraries that redraw per size rather than scaling — such as Fluent UI — generally hold up best. The reliable test is to preview both at your actual render size, which you can do on any icon page on IconStash.