Material Design Icons and Radix Icons are two of the most widely used
open-source icon sets. Both are free, both ship framework packages, and both will look perfectly
reasonable in a product UI — which is exactly why the choice is annoying. This page puts the two
side by side using the actual artwork and the real numbers.
The short answer
Material Design Icons is the broader set: 14,001 icons against 345 in Radix Icons — roughly 3958% more coverage, which matters most if you build interfaces that need unusual glyphs.
Material Design Icons gives you more visual range: 5 variants per concept (outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled), where Radix Icons ships 1.
Both are Apache 2.0, so licensing is not a deciding factor here.
Specifications compared
Specification comparison
Material Design Icons
Radix Icons
Icons
14,001
345
Visual variants per concept
5 — outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled
1 — outline only
Design grid
24×24
15×15
License
Apache 2.0
MIT
Attribution required
No
No
Official React package
@mui/icons-material
@radix-ui/react-icons
Same icons, both libraries
Every pair below is the same concept rendered from each library's own source files. This is the
part you cannot get from a written review — the difference in stroke weight, corner rounding and
optical size is the thing you will actually notice in your interface.
Material Design IconsRadix Icons
home
—
search
—
settings
—
user
heart
star
—
cart
bell
—
mail
calendar
Which one should you choose?
Pick Material Design Icons when
Products that follow Material Design, Android-adjacent apps, and any interface where recognition matters more than distinctiveness. If your users already use Gmail, Drive, or Android, these icons need no explanation.
Consider otherwise if: Google's newer Material Symbols supersedes this set with variable-font icons in a single file. For a less Google-flavoured look, Fluent UI and Carbon are the enterprise equivalents.
Pick Radix Icons when
Dense product UI: data tables, command palettes, context menus, settings panels, and anywhere you need an icon to occupy as little space as possible while staying legible.
Consider otherwise if: The 345-icon count is small, so you will hit gaps quickly in a large product. Heroicons also ships a drawn 16px size with many more icons; Lucide covers far more concepts at 24×24.
Coverage
Material Design Icons contains 14,001 icons and Radix Icons contains 345.
Material Design Icons is Google's official icon set, and it is the most widely deployed icon vocabulary on the web. The 14,001 icons follow the Material geometry rules — a 24×24 grid with 2px keypoint padding, straight edges softened by corner radii, and a deliberate, slightly geometric construction.
Radix Icons is a deliberately small set of 345 icons from the Radix UI team, drawn on a 15×15 grid. That grid is the whole point: Radix icons are designed to sit inside dense product interfaces — tables, toolbars, context menus, and form controls — where a 24×24 icon would force you to loosen your spacing.
Licensing
Material Design Icons is released under Apache 2.0.
No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files.
Radix Icons is released under MIT.
Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required.
Using them from IconStash
You do not have to commit to one. IconStash indexes both libraries, so you can search a concept
once and see how each set drew it, then export SVG or PNG at any size and colour. Start with
Material Design Icons or
Radix Icons, or browse
every library comparison.
Frequently asked questions
Is Material or Radix better for React projects?
Both have first-party React packages: @mui/icons-material and @radix-ui/react-icons. Material has the larger catalogue, so for a React app the practical difference is coverage and visual style rather than integration effort. Both tree-shake, so bundle size tracks the number of icons you import, not the size of the library.
Which has more icons, Material or Radix?
Material Design Icons has 14,001 icons and Radix Icons has 345. Material Design Icons is larger by about 3958%. Raw count is not the whole story though — a 20,000-icon set with many near-duplicate variants can be slower to search than a tightly edited 2,000-icon set.
Can I mix Material and Radix in one interface?
You can, but it usually looks wrong. Each library draws to its own grid and stroke weight — Material uses 24×24 and Radix uses 15×15 — so icons from both sit slightly differently next to each other. If you must mix them, keep each library to a distinct area of the interface rather than interleaving them in the same toolbar.
What licenses do Material and Radix use?
Material Design Icons is Apache 2.0: No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files. Radix Icons is MIT: Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required. Neither requires payment, but attribution rules differ, so check before shipping in a product where credit is inconvenient.
Do Material and Radix include filled and outline versions?
Material Design Icons offers outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled; Radix Icons offers outline only. If you need to express selected and unselected states with the same glyph, the library with more variants saves you from importing a second set.
Which is better for small sizes like 16px?
At 16px, stroke weight and counter size matter more than coverage. Material draws on a 24×24 grid and Radix on 15×15. Libraries that redraw per size rather than scaling — such as Fluent UI — generally hold up best. The reliable test is to preview both at your actual render size, which you can do on any icon page on IconStash.