Icons

Material vs Iconoir

Material Design Icons and Iconoir are two of the most widely used open-source icon sets. Both are free, both ship framework packages, and both will look perfectly reasonable in a product UI — which is exactly why the choice is annoying. This page puts the two side by side using the actual artwork and the real numbers.

The short answer

  • Material Design Icons is the broader set: 14,001 icons against 2,020 in Iconoir — roughly 593% more coverage, which matters most if you build interfaces that need unusual glyphs.
  • Material Design Icons gives you more visual range: 5 variants per concept (outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled), where Iconoir ships 1.
  • Both are Apache 2.0, so licensing is not a deciding factor here.

Specifications compared

Specification comparison
 Material Design IconsIconoir
Icons14,0012,020
Visual variants per concept5 — outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled1 — outline only
Design grid24×2424×24
LicenseApache 2.0MIT
Attribution requiredNoNo
Official React package@mui/icons-materialiconoir-react

Same icons, both libraries

Every pair below is the same concept rendered from each library's own source files. This is the part you cannot get from a written review — the difference in stroke weight, corner rounding and optical size is the thing you will actually notice in your interface.

Material Design IconsIconoir 
home
search
settings
user
heart
star
cart
bell
mail
calendar

Which one should you choose?

Pick Material Design Icons when

Products that follow Material Design, Android-adjacent apps, and any interface where recognition matters more than distinctiveness. If your users already use Gmail, Drive, or Android, these icons need no explanation.

Consider otherwise if: Google's newer Material Symbols supersedes this set with variable-font icons in a single file. For a less Google-flavoured look, Fluent UI and Carbon are the enterprise equivalents.

Pick Iconoir when

Side projects, startups, and open-source tools that need breadth without a licensing conversation. Iconoir is a reliable default when you do not yet know which icons you will need.

Consider otherwise if: Lucide has stronger governance and a larger community; Tabler has roughly triple the icon count. Iconoir's advantage is that nothing is ever paywalled.

Coverage

Material Design Icons contains 14,001 icons and Iconoir contains 2,020. Material Design Icons is Google's official icon set, and it is the most widely deployed icon vocabulary on the web. The 14,001 icons follow the Material geometry rules — a 24×24 grid with 2px keypoint padding, straight edges softened by corner radii, and a deliberate, slightly geometric construction.

Iconoir started as one designer's answer to a simple frustration: good icon libraries kept gating the useful icons behind a paid tier. The set is 2,020 icons on a 24×24 grid with a 1.5px stroke, and there is no premium version — every icon is free, forever.

Licensing

Material Design Icons is released under Apache 2.0. No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files.

Iconoir is released under MIT. Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required.

Using them from IconStash

You do not have to commit to one. IconStash indexes both libraries, so you can search a concept once and see how each set drew it, then export SVG or PNG at any size and colour. Start with Material Design Icons or Iconoir, or browse every library comparison.

Frequently asked questions

Is Material or Iconoir better for React projects?

Both have first-party React packages: @mui/icons-material and iconoir-react. Material has the larger catalogue, so for a React app the practical difference is coverage and visual style rather than integration effort. Both tree-shake, so bundle size tracks the number of icons you import, not the size of the library.

Which has more icons, Material or Iconoir?

Material Design Icons has 14,001 icons and Iconoir has 2,020. Material Design Icons is larger by about 593%. Raw count is not the whole story though — a 20,000-icon set with many near-duplicate variants can be slower to search than a tightly edited 2,000-icon set.

Can I mix Material and Iconoir in one interface?

You can, but it usually looks wrong. Each library draws to its own grid and stroke weight — Material uses 24×24 and Iconoir uses 24×24 — so icons from both sit slightly differently next to each other. If you must mix them, keep each library to a distinct area of the interface rather than interleaving them in the same toolbar.

What licenses do Material and Iconoir use?

Material Design Icons is Apache 2.0: No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files. Iconoir is MIT: Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required. Neither requires payment, but attribution rules differ, so check before shipping in a product where credit is inconvenient.

Do Material and Iconoir include filled and outline versions?

Material Design Icons offers outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled; Iconoir offers outline only. If you need to express selected and unselected states with the same glyph, the library with more variants saves you from importing a second set.

Which is better for small sizes like 16px?

At 16px, stroke weight and counter size matter more than coverage. Material draws on a 24×24 grid and Iconoir on 24×24. Libraries that redraw per size rather than scaling — such as Fluent UI — generally hold up best. The reliable test is to preview both at your actual render size, which you can do on any icon page on IconStash.