Material Design Icons and Bootstrap Icons are two of the most widely used
open-source icon sets. Both are free, both ship framework packages, and both will look perfectly
reasonable in a product UI — which is exactly why the choice is annoying. This page puts the two
side by side using the actual artwork and the real numbers.
The short answer
Material Design Icons is the broader set: 14,001 icons against 2,090 in Bootstrap Icons — roughly 570% more coverage, which matters most if you build interfaces that need unusual glyphs.
Material Design Icons gives you more visual range: 5 variants per concept (outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled), where Bootstrap Icons ships 3.
Both are Apache 2.0, so licensing is not a deciding factor here.
Specifications compared
Specification comparison
Material Design Icons
Bootstrap Icons
Icons
14,001
2,090
Visual variants per concept
5 — outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled
3 — outline, filled and more
Design grid
24×24
16×16
License
Apache 2.0
MIT
Attribution required
No
No
Official React package
@mui/icons-material
bootstrap-icons
Same icons, both libraries
Every pair below is the same concept rendered from each library's own source files. This is the
part you cannot get from a written review — the difference in stroke weight, corner rounding and
optical size is the thing you will actually notice in your interface.
Material Design IconsBootstrap Icons
—
home
search
—
settings
—
user
heart
star
cart
bell
—
mail
calendar
Which one should you choose?
Pick Material Design Icons when
Products that follow Material Design, Android-adjacent apps, and any interface where recognition matters more than distinctiveness. If your users already use Gmail, Drive, or Android, these icons need no explanation.
Consider otherwise if: Google's newer Material Symbols supersedes this set with variable-font icons in a single file. For a less Google-flavoured look, Fluent UI and Carbon are the enterprise equivalents.
Pick Bootstrap Icons when
Bootstrap-based projects, admin templates, and compact interfaces where icons sit next to 14px text and need to hold their own at 16px.
Consider otherwise if: If you need strict visual consistency, the mixed fill and stroke treatment can look uneven next to Lucide or Feather. For a larger set with similar small-size optimisation, compare Octicons.
Coverage
Material Design Icons contains 14,001 icons and Bootstrap Icons contains 2,090.
Material Design Icons is Google's official icon set, and it is the most widely deployed icon vocabulary on the web. The 14,001 icons follow the Material geometry rules — a 24×24 grid with 2px keypoint padding, straight edges softened by corner radii, and a deliberate, slightly geometric construction.
Bootstrap Icons is the official icon set for the Bootstrap framework, built by the Bootstrap team. The 2,090 icons are drawn on a 16×16 grid — tighter than the 24×24 used by most libraries — which makes them pair naturally with Bootstrap's default typography and compact control sizing.
Licensing
Material Design Icons is released under Apache 2.0.
No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files.
Bootstrap Icons is released under MIT.
Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required.
Using them from IconStash
You do not have to commit to one. IconStash indexes both libraries, so you can search a concept
once and see how each set drew it, then export SVG or PNG at any size and colour. Start with
Material Design Icons or
Bootstrap Icons, or browse
every library comparison.
Frequently asked questions
Is Material or Bootstrap better for React projects?
Both have first-party React packages: @mui/icons-material and bootstrap-icons. Material has the larger catalogue, so for a React app the practical difference is coverage and visual style rather than integration effort. Both tree-shake, so bundle size tracks the number of icons you import, not the size of the library.
Which has more icons, Material or Bootstrap?
Material Design Icons has 14,001 icons and Bootstrap Icons has 2,090. Material Design Icons is larger by about 570%. Raw count is not the whole story though — a 20,000-icon set with many near-duplicate variants can be slower to search than a tightly edited 2,000-icon set.
Can I mix Material and Bootstrap in one interface?
You can, but it usually looks wrong. Each library draws to its own grid and stroke weight — Material uses 24×24 and Bootstrap uses 16×16 — so icons from both sit slightly differently next to each other. If you must mix them, keep each library to a distinct area of the interface rather than interleaving them in the same toolbar.
What licenses do Material and Bootstrap use?
Material Design Icons is Apache 2.0: No attribution required, but carries an explicit patent grant and requires notice for modified files. Bootstrap Icons is MIT: Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required. Neither requires payment, but attribution rules differ, so check before shipping in a product where credit is inconvenient.
Do Material and Bootstrap include filled and outline versions?
Material Design Icons offers outlined, rounded, sharp, two-tone and filled; Bootstrap Icons offers outline, filled and more. If you need to express selected and unselected states with the same glyph, the library with more variants saves you from importing a second set.
Which is better for small sizes like 16px?
At 16px, stroke weight and counter size matter more than coverage. Material draws on a 24×24 grid and Bootstrap on 16×16. Libraries that redraw per size rather than scaling — such as Fluent UI — generally hold up best. The reliable test is to preview both at your actual render size, which you can do on any icon page on IconStash.