Icons

Fluent UI vs Solar

Fluent UI Icons and Solar Icons are two of the most widely used open-source icon sets. Both are free, both ship framework packages, and both will look perfectly reasonable in a product UI — which is exactly why the choice is annoying. This page puts the two side by side using the actual artwork and the real numbers.

The short answer

  • Fluent UI Icons is the broader set: 20,170 icons against 7,410 in Solar Icons — roughly 172% more coverage, which matters most if you build interfaces that need unusual glyphs.
  • Solar Icons gives you more visual range: 6 variants per concept (six coordinated styles), where Fluent UI Icons ships 2.
  • On licensing, Fluent UI Icons is the safer default (MIT versus CC BY 4.0).

Specifications compared

Specification comparison
 Fluent UI IconsSolar Icons
Icons20,1707,410
Visual variants per concept2 — regular and filled6 — six coordinated styles
Design grid12–4824×24
LicenseMITCC BY 4.0
Attribution requiredNoYes
Official React package@fluentui/react-iconssolar-icon-set

Same icons, both libraries

Every pair below is the same concept rendered from each library's own source files. This is the part you cannot get from a written review — the difference in stroke weight, corner rounding and optical size is the thing you will actually notice in your interface.

Fluent UI IconsSolar Icons 
home
search
settings
user
heart
star
cart
bell
mail
calendar

Which one should you choose?

Pick Fluent UI Icons when

Enterprise applications, Microsoft 365 integrations, and products that already follow Fluent or need extremely broad coverage. The count alone means you will rarely need to look elsewhere.

Consider otherwise if: The size is also a drawback — with 20,170 icons, maintaining visual consistency across a product takes more discipline. Lucide and Heroicons are far easier to keep coherent.

Pick Solar Icons when

SaaS dashboards, admin templates, and marketing sites that want a premium, contemporary look rather than a neutral system feel. Duotone styles work especially well in empty states and feature cards.

Consider otherwise if: Solar is CC BY 4.0, so it requires attribution — if that is a problem, Phosphor (MIT) offers a comparable six-weight range and Huge Icons (MIT) offers six styles of its own.

Coverage

Fluent UI Icons contains 20,170 icons and Solar Icons contains 7,410. Fluent UI Icons is Microsoft's icon library for the Fluent Design System, and at 20,170 icons it is the largest set indexed on IconStash. The icons are drawn across multiple sizes from 12px to 48px and in Regular and Filled styles.

Solar is a premium-feeling icon pack of 7,410 icons from 480 Design, and it is one of the most widely used sets in SaaS and mobile product design. Every icon comes in six styles: Linear, Outline, Bold, Duotone, Broken, and Bold Duotone.

Licensing

Fluent UI Icons is released under MIT. Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required.

Solar Icons is released under CC BY 4.0. Requires visible attribution wherever the icons appear.

One of these two requires attribution. If the icons will appear somewhere a credit line is impractical — an app icon, a hardware label, a slide deck template — that alone may settle the decision.

Using them from IconStash

You do not have to commit to one. IconStash indexes both libraries, so you can search a concept once and see how each set drew it, then export SVG or PNG at any size and colour. Start with Fluent UI Icons or Solar Icons, or browse every library comparison.

Frequently asked questions

Is Fluent UI or Solar better for React projects?

Both have first-party React packages: @fluentui/react-icons and solar-icon-set. Fluent UI has the larger catalogue, so for a React app the practical difference is coverage and visual style rather than integration effort. Both tree-shake, so bundle size tracks the number of icons you import, not the size of the library.

Which has more icons, Fluent UI or Solar?

Fluent UI Icons has 20,170 icons and Solar Icons has 7,410. Fluent UI Icons is larger by about 172%. Raw count is not the whole story though — a 20,000-icon set with many near-duplicate variants can be slower to search than a tightly edited 2,000-icon set.

Can I mix Fluent UI and Solar in one interface?

You can, but it usually looks wrong. Each library draws to its own grid and stroke weight — Fluent UI uses 12–48 and Solar uses 24×24 — so icons from both sit slightly differently next to each other. If you must mix them, keep each library to a distinct area of the interface rather than interleaving them in the same toolbar.

What licenses do Fluent UI and Solar use?

Fluent UI Icons is MIT: Commercial use, modification and redistribution with no attribution required. Solar Icons is CC BY 4.0: Requires visible attribution wherever the icons appear. Neither requires payment, but attribution rules differ, so check before shipping in a product where credit is inconvenient.

Do Fluent UI and Solar include filled and outline versions?

Fluent UI Icons offers regular and filled; Solar Icons offers six coordinated styles. If you need to express selected and unselected states with the same glyph, the library with more variants saves you from importing a second set.

Which is better for small sizes like 16px?

At 16px, stroke weight and counter size matter more than coverage. Fluent UI draws on a 12–48 grid and Solar on 24×24. Libraries that redraw per size rather than scaling — such as Fluent UI — generally hold up best. The reliable test is to preview both at your actual render size, which you can do on any icon page on IconStash.